Citibank, N.A.

Reference number: 124704

Instant download

Authorised by the FCA

This firm is on the FCA register and authorised to carry out regulated activities.

Website, phone number and address

Compare these against whatever you were given. Scammers clone real firm names and reference numbers but use their own phone number and website, so a detail that does not match the register is the clearest warning sign there is.

In the full report: 3 background checks

  • When citibank.com first appeared online, and whether it can receive email
  • What kind of line 0800 005 500 is, and the 4 other firms that give it
  • Who else gives the postcode E14 5LB
Instant PDF download
Other names (3)

If you were contacted under any of these names, it is this firm.

  • Citi Trading name: A name it trades under now.
  • Citibank Trading name: A name it trades under now.
  • Citi Private Bank Trading name: A name it trades under now.

FCA permissions and consumer protection

  • Hold or safeguard your money FSCS may apply
    Eligible deposits are typically protected by the FSCS up to £120,000 per person, per banking group.
  • Give regulated advice FSCS may apply
    A claim for unsuitable advice is itself FSCS-protected, up to the limit that applies to the product you were advised on.
  • Manage or trade investments FSCS may apply
    Eligible investment and pension claims are typically FSCS-protected up to £85,000 per person, depending on the product and your circumstances.
  • Sell or arrange insurance FSCS may apply
    Eligible insurance claims may be FSCS-protected, often 90%, or 100% for compulsory or long-term cover.
  • Advise on or arrange mortgages FSCS may apply
    Mortgage advice and arranging may be FSCS-covered, up to the limit that applies.
  • Lend or arrange credit No FSCS cover
    Consumer credit is not covered by the FSCS, so there is no compensation scheme if the firm fails.
  • Complaints Ombudsman, free
    You can refer a complaint about this firm to the Financial Ombudsman Service for free, whichever activity it relates to.
Show FCA detail (19 permissions)
  • Accepting Deposits
  • Administering a regulated mortgage contract
  • Advising on investments (except on Pension Transfers and Pension Opt Outs)
  • Advising on regulated mortgage contracts
  • Arranging (bringing about) deals in investments
  • Arranging (bringing about) regulated mortgage contracts
  • Arranging safeguarding and administration of assets
  • Assisting in the administration and performance of a contract of insurance
  • Bidding in emissions auctions
  • Causing dematerialised instructions to be sent
  • Credit Broking
  • Dealing in investments as agent
  • Dealing in investments as principal
  • Entering into a regulated mortgage contract as lender
  • Making arrangements with a view to regulated mortgage contracts
  • Making arrangements with a view to transactions in investments
  • Managing investments
  • Safeguarding and administration of assets (without arranging)
  • Sending dematerialised instructions

Limits on what they may do

  • Not permitted to canvass off trade premises
    The firm is not permitted to canvass regulated borrower-lender-supplier agreements or regulated consumer hire agreements off trade premises

FCA disciplinary action

FCA action

fines
2
in fines
£269.5m
most recent
November 2019
  • Fined £43.89m on 26 November 2019
    On 26 November 2019, the PRA issued Citigroup Global Markets Limited (CGML), Citibank N.A. London Branch (CBNA London) and Citibank Europe Plc UK branch (CEP UK) (“Citi”) with a financial penalty of £43,890,000 pursuant to section 206 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. The reason for this action was that, between 19 June 2014 and 31 December 2018, Citi breached relevant requirements under the PRA Rulebook. Specifically, CGML and CBNA London breached Fundamental Rule 6 (a firm must organise and control its affairs responsibly and effectively). CBNA London and CEP UK also breached the Branch Rule Return (requires incoming and third-party firms to provide the PRA with specified information) and all three firms breached Rule 6.1 of the Notifications Part of the PRA rulebook (firms must take reasonable steps to ensure the information they submit to the PRA is complete and accurate).    A copy of the Final Notice can be found on the Bank of England’s website and can be accessed.
  • Fined £225.57m on 11 November 2014
    The Financial Conduct Authority (the FCA) imposed a financial penalty of £225,575,000 on Citibank N.A. (Citi) of Citigroup Centre, Canada Square, Canary Wharf London, E14 5LB. The FCA's action took effect on 11 November 2014 and a copy of the Final Notice, which sets out the reasons for the action is displayed on the FCA's website and can be accessed via the following link: http://www.fca.org.uk/static/documents/final-notices/final-notice-citi-bank.pdf The foreign exchange market (FX market) is one of the largest and most liquid markets in the world. Its integrity is of central importance to the UK and global financial systems. Over a period of five years, Citi failed properly to control its London voice trading operations in the G10 spot FX market, with the result that traders in this part of its business were able to behave in a manner that put Citi's interests ahead of the interests of its clients, other market participants and the wider UK financial system. The FCA expects firms to identify, assess and manage appropriately the risks that their business poses to the markets in which they operate and to preserve market integrity, irrespective of whether or not those markets are regulated. The FCA also expects firms to promote a culture which requires their staff to have regard to the impact of their behaviour on clients, other participants in those markets and the financial markets as a whole. Citi's failure adequately to control its London voice trading operations in the G10 spot FX market is extremely serious. The importance of this market and its widespread use by market participants throughout the financial system means that misconduct relating to it has potentially damaging and far-reaching consequences for the G10 spot FX market and financial markets generally. The failings described in the Final Notice undermine confidence in the UK financial system and put its integrity at risk. Citi breached Principle 3 of the FCA's Principles for Businesses in the period from 1 January 2008 to 15 October 2013 (the Relevant Period) by failing to take reasonable care to organise and control its affairs responsibly and effectively with adequate risk management systems in relation to G10 spot FX voice trading in London. References in the Final Notice to Citi's G10 spot FX trading business refer to its relevant voice trading desk based in London. During the Relevant Period, Citi did not exercise adequate and effective control over its G10 spot FX trading business. Citi relied primarily upon its front office FX business to identify, assess and manage risks arising in that business. The front office failed adequately to discharge these responsibilities with regard to obvious risks associated with confidentiality, conflicts of interest and trading conduct. The right values and culture were not sufficiently embedded in Citi's G10 spot FX trading business, which resulted in it acting in Citi's own interests as described in the Final Notice without proper regard for the interests of its clients, other market participants or the wider UK financial system. The lack of proper control by Citi over the activities of its G10 spot FX traders in London undermined market integrity and meant that misconduct went undetected for a number of years. Citi's control and risk functions failed to challenge effectively the management of these risks in the G10 spot FX trading business. Citi's failings in this regard allowed the following behaviours to occur in its G10 spot FX trading business: (1) Attempts to manipulate the WMR and the ECB fix rates in collusion with traders at other firms, for Citi's own benefit and to the potential detriment of certain of its clients and/or other market participants; (2) Attempts to trigger clients' stop loss orders for Citi's own benefit and to the potential detriment of those clients and/or other market participants; and (3) Inappropriate sharing of confidential information withtraders at other firms, including specific client identities and, as part of (1) and (2) above, information about clients' orders. These failings occurred in circumstances where certain of those responsible for managing front office matters were aware of and/or at times involved in behaviours described above. They also occurred despite the fact that risks around confidentiality were highlighted when in August 2011 Citi became aware that a trader in its FX business outside London had inappropriately shared confidential client information in a chat room with a trader at another firm. Citi was aware during the Relevant Period of misconduct associated with LIBOR / EURIBOR, which was identified in well-publicised Final Notices issued against other firms. Citi was not subject to enforcement action by the FCA for LIBOR / EURIBOR misconduct during the Relevant Period. It nonetheless engaged in a remediation programme across its businesses in response to these Notices.This included taking steps to improve procedures for Citi's contributions to submissions-based benchmarks and to embed the right values in its business. Despite these improvements, the steps taken during the Relevant Period in its G10 spot FX trading business did not adequately address the root causes that gave rise to failings described in the Final Notice. The FCA acknowledges the significant co-operation and assistance provided by Citi during the course of its investigation. Citi is continuing to undertake remedial action and has committed significant resources to improving the business practices and associated controls relating to its FX operations. The FCA recognises the work already undertaken by Citi in this regard. The Final Notice relates solely to Citi's conduct in its G10 spot FX trading business in London. It makes no criticism of any entities other than the firms engaged in misconduct as described in the Final Notice.

The Financial Ombudsman Service only publishes complaint figures for firms with 30 or more new complaints in six months, so there are none here for this firm.

Companies House record

The company behind the firm: its status, age, registered office and directors.

Company status
Active
Company type
Overseas company
Incorporated
4 June 1920 (106 years old)
Registered office
388 Greenwich Street, New York, New York 10013, United States

Directors and company secretaries

Name Role Born Appointed Other companies
James Stanton Turley Director Sep 1955 9 Jul 2013 1 other company
Duncan Pratt Hennes Director Aug 1956 11 Dec 2013 1 other company
Grace Dailey Director Aug 1960 20 Oct 2020 None
Jane Fraser Director Jul 1967 22 Oct 2020 None
Sunil Garg Director Feb 1966 26 Feb 2021 None
Ellen Marie Costello Director Sep 1954 30 Apr 2024 None
Titilope Cole Director Jan 1973 3 Feb 2025 None
Adam Meshel Secretary Not published 15 Jun 2022 –

Other companies run by these 7 directors

A firm is run by people, and their other companies are their track record: what they built, what closed, and anything that failed. It is the check most people never think to make.

other companies
2
still active
1

In the full report: all 2 companies, named

  • What each company does, and whether it is still trading
  • Which of these 7 directors sit on each board, and since when
  • Any that went into liquidation or administration
  • All 66 people who have ever been directors, with their dates
Instant PDF download

Key dates in its history

Citibank, N.A.’s history from the FCA register and Companies House, newest first.

2019

26 November 2019

  • Fined £43.89m by the PRA

FCA register

2016

21 April 2016

  • FCA imposed a requirement (Not permitted to canvass off trade premises)

FCA register

2014

11 November 2014

  • Fined £225.57m by the FCA

FCA register

2013

1 April 2013

  • Regulated by the FCA from this date
  • Regulated by the Prudential Regulation Authority from this date

FCA register

2001

1 December 2001

  • Regulated by the Financial Services Authority from this date
  • Became authorised by the FCA

FCA register

1988

22 December 1988

  • Regulated by the Federal Reserve Board from this date
  • Regulated by the Securities and Futures Authority from this date

FCA register

1920

4 June 1920

  • Incorporated at Companies House

Companies House

In the full report: all 146 events

  • All 146 events in its history (10 shown here)
  • Every director appointment and resignation: 129
Instant PDF download

Firms connected to Citibank, N.A.

Other FCA-listed firms that share a director, phone number or address with Citibank, N.A.. A link shows who the firm is tied to, not whether either can be trusted.

connected firms
4
share its phone number
4
share its postcode
4

In the full report: all 4 connected firms, named

  • How each is linked: the same phone number (4), the same postcode (4)
  • Who links each one: the named directors, with dates
Instant PDF download

Firms like Citibank, N.A.

Other firms of the same type (bank or building society), nearest first.

In London

Firms are listed by type and location, best known first. Being listed is not a recommendation: check any firm before you deal with it.

Get the full report on Citibank, N.A.

Everything on this page, plus everything locked above, in one dated PDF you can keep, file or send on.

  • 2 other companies its directors have run, named
  • 3 background checks on its contact details
  • All 146 events in its history
  • 4 connected firms, named, and who links them

Instant PDF One-off payment Secure checkout by Stripe

Frequently asked questions about this firm

Is Citibank, N.A. FCA authorised?
Yes, Citibank, N.A. (FRN 124704) is authorised by the FCA to carry out regulated activities. It has held its current authorisation since December 2001 and works as a bank or building society. The FCA has placed a limit on what it may do.
What is Citibank, N.A.’s phone number and website?
The FCA register lists the phone number 0800 005 500 and the website citibank.com for Citibank, N.A.. If you were given different contact details, use these to check with the firm before going any further. The same number is also given by 4 other FCA firms.
Is Citibank, N.A. a scam or clone?
Citibank, N.A. is a genuine FCA-listed firm, and the FCA has published no warnings about fake versions of it. Scammers do copy real firms, though, so check that any contact details you were given match the ones on the register.
Is my money safe with Citibank, N.A.?
It depends on the product, but eligible claims may be protected by the FSCS. You can also refer complaints about Citibank, N.A. to the Financial Ombudsman Service, free of charge.
Who runs Citibank, N.A.?
Companies House lists 7 directors of Citibank, N.A.: James Stanton Turley, Duncan Pratt Hennes, Grace Dailey, Jane Fraser, Sunil Garg, Ellen Marie Costello and 1 more.
How long has Citibank, N.A. been in business?
The company was formed on 4 June 1920, and has held its current FCA authorisation since December 2001.
Has the FCA taken action against Citibank, N.A.?
Yes. The FCA register records 2 fines between 2014 and 2019, £269.46m in total. The details are in the disciplinary section above, with links to the FCA's notices.
Does Citibank, N.A. use any other names?
It trades as Citi, Citibank and Citi Private Bank.

Sources and links

The full report on Citibank, N.A.

£19.99 · Instant PDF download

Loading secure checkout…