Hcl Insurance Bpo Services Limited

Reference number: 417450

Instant download

Authorised by the FCA

This firm is on the FCA register and authorised to carry out regulated activities.

Website, phone number and address

Compare these against whatever you were given. Scammers clone real firm names and reference numbers but use their own phone number and website, so a detail that does not match the register is the clearest warning sign there is.

In the full report: 3 background checks

  • When hcltech.com first appeared online, and whether it can receive email
  • What kind of line 020 3714 8129 is
  • Who else gives the postcode RM1 3PJ
Instant PDF download
Other names (1)

If you were contacted under any of these names, it is this firm.

  • Liberata Financial Services Ltd Former name: A name it was registered under before.

FCA permissions and consumer protection

  • Manage or trade investments FSCS may apply
    Eligible investment and pension claims are typically FSCS-protected up to £85,000 per person, depending on the product and your circumstances.
  • Sell or arrange insurance FSCS may apply
    Eligible insurance claims may be FSCS-protected, often 90%, or 100% for compulsory or long-term cover.
  • Complaints Ombudsman, free
    You can refer a complaint about this firm to the Financial Ombudsman Service for free, whichever activity it relates to.
Show FCA detail (4 permissions)
  • Arranging (bringing about) deals in investments
  • Assisting in the administration and performance of a contract of insurance
  • Debt Administration
  • Making arrangements with a view to transactions in investments

FCA disciplinary action

FCA action

fine
1
in fines
£525k
most recent
April 2008
  • Fined £525,000 on 8 April 2008
    On 8 April 2008 the FSA imposed a financial penalty of £525,000 on Liberata Financial Services Limited (LFS) in respect of breaches of Principles 3 and 2 of the FSA's Principles for Businesses (the Principles) between 6 January 2005 and 25 April 2007 (the Relevant Period) in relation to failures in its systems and controls for producing and issuing documents to policyholders. LFS agreed to settle at an early stage of the FSA's investigation. It therefore qualified for a 30% reduction in penalty, pursuant to the FSA's executive settlement procedures. Were it not for this discount, the FSA would have sought to impose a financial penalty of £750,000 on LFS. The FSA has imposed a financial penalty on LFS for breaches of the FSA's Principles. These breaches relate to LFS's: 1) failure to take reasonable care to organise and control its affairs responsibly and effectively, with adequate risk management systems (Principle 3); and 2) failure to conduct its business with due skill, care and diligence (Principle 2). LFS's failures relate to its systems and controls for producing and issuing documents to policyholders relating to investment, savings and retirement products. These failings include ineffective procedures, inadequate monitoring of document production and a failure to act appropriately in response to warnings that documents were not being produced. The failings resulted in customers not being treated fairly. As a consequence of the failings, approximately 30,000 policyholders did not receive documents containing important information about their savings, investment and pension products (some of these documents were due to be sent prior to LFS becoming regulated). Of these policyholders, 161 suffered financial loss, as a result of documents not being issued, amounting to £17,584. The extent of the failings resulted in an unacceptable risk that any of the policyholders whose policies LFS administered using its automated document production system (approximately 1.3 million policyholders) would not receive important financial information on which to base their investment decisions and, consequently, suffer financial loss. The FSA considers these failings to be particularly serious because: 1) the production and timely dispatch of documents to policyholders was a core part of LFS's business. Despite this, LFS's systems and controls were wholly inadequate to investigate and resolve errors in its document production process; 2) between December 2005 and January 2007 LFS acted recklessly in failing to consider warnings in its management information that documents subject to its automated production process were not being produced; 3) despite being aware in April 2006 that a number of policyholders had not received documents and that a third of these were at risk of financial loss, LFS failed to consider whether other policyholders had been similarly affected; and 4) the failings persisted over a significant period of time. LFS's failures therefore merit the imposition of a financial penalty. In deciding upon the level of disciplinary sanction, the FSA recognised the following measures taken by LFS which serve to mitigate the seriousness of its failings: 1) LFS appointed external consultants in February 2007 to assist it to review its document production system, identify the documentation which had not been produced, analyse the potential impact on policyholders and ensure that all appropriate documents were provided to policyholders; 2) By April 2007, new management implemented a comprehensive review of LFS's systems and controls. This led to the restructuring of its management and oversight arrangements, improvements in management information and the installation of a dedicated team to oversee its document production system; 3) LFS implemented a remedial action plan, in April 2007, which ensured that all policyholders who suffered financial loss were promptly compensated; and 4) LFS co-operated fully with the FSAn the course of its investigation, including proactively identifying relevant information and bringing it to the FSA's attention. LFS has agreed the facts quickly ensuring an efficient resolution of the matter.

The Financial Ombudsman Service only publishes complaint figures for firms with 30 or more new complaints in six months, so there are none here for this firm.

Companies House record

The company behind the firm: its status, age, registered office and directors.

Company status
Active
Company type
Private limited company
Incorporated
1 December 2004 (21 years old)
Registered office
Hcl House, 28-36 Eastern Road, Romford, Essex, RM1 3PJ, England
Nature of business
  • Other activities auxiliary to insurance and pension funding (SIC 66290)
  • Management consultancy activities other than financial management (SIC 70229)
  • Other business support service activities not elsewhere classified (SIC 82990)

Directors and company secretaries

Name Role Born Appointed Other companies
Sugata Gupta Director Feb 1965 27 Feb 2018 None
Shiv Kumar Walia Director Jan 1969 2 Feb 2022 12 other companies
Satya Swarup Mishra Director Nov 1972 11 Apr 2023 None
Sushant Jain Director Feb 1981 15 Sep 2024 1 other company

Other companies run by these 4 directors

A firm is run by people, and their other companies are their track record: what they built, what closed, and anything that failed. It is the check most people never think to make.

other companies
13
closed down
5
is FCA-registered
1

In the full report: all 13 companies, named

  • What each company does, and whether it is still trading
  • Which of these 4 directors sit on each board, and since when
  • Any that went into liquidation or administration
  • The one on the FCA register
  • All 33 people who have ever been directors, with their dates
Instant PDF download

Key dates in its history

Hcl Insurance Bpo Services’s history from the FCA register and Companies House, newest first.

2024

1 July 2024

  • Sivaprasad Sivasubramaniam Nadar stopped being the majority owner

Companies House

2016

6 April 2016

  • Sivaprasad Sivasubramaniam Nadar became the majority owner (50–75% of shares)

Companies House

2013

1 April 2013

  • Regulated by the FCA from this date

FCA register

2009

14 April 2009

  • Changed its registered name from "Liberata Financial Services Ltd"

FCA register

2008

8 April 2008

  • Fined £525,000 by the FCA

FCA register

2005

6 January 2005

  • Became authorised by the FCA

FCA register

5 January 2005

  • Regulated by the Financial Services Authority from this date

FCA register

2004

1 December 2004

  • Incorporated at Companies House

Companies House

In the full report: all 74 events

  • All 74 events in its history (8 shown here)
  • Every director appointment and resignation: 64
Instant PDF download

Firms connected to Hcl Insurance Bpo Services

Other FCA-listed firms that share a director, phone number or address with Hcl Insurance Bpo Services. A link shows who the firm is tied to, not whether either can be trusted.

connected firms
2
share a director
1
share its postcode
1

In the full report: all 2 connected firms, named

  • How each is linked: shared directors (1), the same postcode (1)
  • Who links each one: the named directors, with dates
Instant PDF download

Firms like Hcl Insurance Bpo Services

Other firms of the same type (insurance broker), nearest first.

In Romford

Firms are listed by type and location, best known first. Being listed is not a recommendation: check any firm before you deal with it.

Get the full report on Hcl Insurance Bpo Services

Everything on this page, plus everything locked above, in one dated PDF you can keep, file or send on.

  • 13 other companies its directors have run, named
  • 3 background checks on its contact details
  • All 74 events in its history
  • 2 connected firms, named, and who links them

Instant PDF One-off payment Secure checkout by Stripe

Frequently asked questions about this firm

Is Hcl Insurance Bpo Services Limited FCA authorised?
Yes, Hcl Insurance Bpo Services Limited (FRN 417450) is authorised by the FCA to carry out regulated activities. It has held its current authorisation since January 2005 and works as an insurance broker. The FCA has placed no limits on its permissions.
What is Hcl Insurance Bpo Services’ phone number and website?
The FCA register lists the phone number 020 3714 8129 and the website hcltech.com for Hcl Insurance Bpo Services. If you were given different contact details, use these to check with the firm before going any further.
Is Hcl Insurance Bpo Services a scam or clone?
Hcl Insurance Bpo Services is a genuine FCA-listed firm, and the FCA has published no warnings about fake versions of it. Scammers do copy real firms, though, so check that any contact details you were given match the ones on the register.
Is my money safe with Hcl Insurance Bpo Services?
Its FCA permissions do not allow it to hold or control client money. It depends on the product, but eligible claims may be protected by the FSCS. You can also refer complaints about Hcl Insurance Bpo Services to the Financial Ombudsman Service, free of charge.
Who owns Hcl Insurance Bpo Services?
Companies House lists no one with significant control of Hcl Insurance Bpo Services now. Before that, it was controlled by Mr Sivaprasad Sivasubramaniam Nadar.
Who runs Hcl Insurance Bpo Services?
Companies House lists 4 directors of Hcl Insurance Bpo Services: Sugata Gupta, Shiv Kumar Walia, Satya Swarup Mishra and Sushant Jain.
How long has Hcl Insurance Bpo Services been in business?
The company was formed on 1 December 2004, and has held its current FCA authorisation since January 2005.
Has the FCA taken action against Hcl Insurance Bpo Services?
Yes. The FCA register records 1 fine in 2008, £525,000 in total. The details are in the disciplinary section above, with links to the FCA's notices.
Does Hcl Insurance Bpo Services use any other names?
It has previously used the name Liberata Financial Services Ltd.

Sources and links

The full report on Hcl Insurance Bpo Services Limited

£19.99 · Instant PDF download

Loading secure checkout…